Ashley Washburn, April 1, 2018
Department’s culture creates model for national awards success
Over the past five years, the Department of Biological Systems Engineering has had an enviable run of winning highly competitive national awards, including those recognized by the National Research Council, which tracks highly prestigious research honors. The department’s success isn’t a matter of luck – it’s the result of a culture that values teamwork and professional engagement.
At its annual meeting this summer, the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers will honor University of Nebraska-Lincoln researchers Derek Heeren and Yufeng Ge with two of ASABE’s most prestigious early career awards.
Heeren and Ge, both assistant professors of biological systems engineering, have earned the A.W. Farrall Young Educator Award and the New Holland Young Researcher Award, respectively, for their contributions to teaching, research and service.
The awards are impressive in their own rights. Both are highly regarded honors for scholars under age 40. But perhaps more remarkably, they extend BSE’s trajectory of ASABE awards success. Since 2012, Nebraska faculty have received 10 of the organization’s 27 major awards and two ASABE fellowships. Counting Heeren and Ge’s honors, BSE scholars have been tapped for all four of the association’s early career awards in the past three years.
The winning streak stretches beyond ASABE. In 2017, Angela Pannier was the first Nebraska researcher selected for the National Institutes of Health Director’s New Innovator Award; Joe Luck was PrecisionAg’s Educator/Researcher of the Year; and Mark Riley became a fellow of the American Institute for Medical and Biological Engineering.
“These awards are a recognition of our faculty doing really exceptional things,” said David Jones, interim department head.
The pattern of achievement is no accident, according to Jones and other leaders. It’s the result of a strategic effort to hire top-notch faculty, develop a system for identifying nominees and building award applications, and foster a culture that views awards as a boost to the department’s and university’s profile.
“These awards are not just important to the individual, they’re important to society as a whole because they represent something beyond the ivory tower,” said Riley, who served as head of biological systems engineering from 2012 to 2017 and is now the College of Engineering’s associate dean for research. “Recognition of service and outreach helps to ground our faculty in something outside academia.”
Laying the foundation with targeted hiring
Awards wouldn’t be possible without excellent faculty, said Ron Yoder, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources senior associate vice chancellor. Yoder was BSE’s leader from 2004 to 2011 and said hiring people with great potential – then supporting them in their research, service and outreach – is the bedrock of BSE’s success.
“It all goes back to having really good ‘material,’ meaning really great people who are engaged in the department and in their professional organizations,” Yoder said. “When you have that, it’s easy to help them get recognition.”
IANR faculty hiring initiatives during the past decade have been extremely fruitful for BSE, which was able to recruit faculty to Nebraska when hiring at other universities slowed. The department chose the cream of the crop and created mentoring relationships between seasoned faculty and the new cohort, which increased the capacity for collaboration and resource sharing.
“We really tried to hire people who would connect in, as opposed to people who would go in radical and different directions,” Riley said.
Department leadership encourages new hires to engage in professional service, which not only promotes the greater good of science, but also helps early career faculty understand how the societies work and exposes them to colleagues who may serve on future awards selection committees.
Faculty also learn that professional service and leadership – as well as the honors and recognitions that may follow – are linked to their success. Annual departmental reviews address professional participation and awards, which can motivate scholars seeking tenure and promotion.
Creating the pipeline for nominations
Forming an awards committee was integral to the department’s success. Composed of up to five members, the committee identifies and encourages potential nominees, ensuring a smooth application process. The team features a mix of faculty, with at least one member representing the individual areas of extension, teaching and research. It also includes a staff member who helps coordinate applications.
During his tenure as department head, Riley focused on assembling a vibrant, energetic group invested in the nomination process.
“It was more than just having a committee,” he said. “It was appointing people who would be very engaged in the process.”
Jeyam Subbiah, the Kenneth E. Morrison Distinguished Professor in Food Engineering and a professor of biological systems engineering, chaired the committee for nearly eight years. He said having a formal process helps overcome one of the biggest obstacles to winning awards: faculty’s reticence to seek the spotlight.
“I saw that there were a lot of humble people in the department who didn’t want to ask colleagues to say great things about them in nomination letters,” Subbiah said. “It really helps to be able to say, ‘The awards committee thinks you’d be a great candidate for this award.’ If we initiated the process, it gave faculty a higher purpose for pursuing the award.”
The committee plays a major role in examining awards criteria and strategically identifying prospective nominees whose strengths and portfolios align. The group also targets colleagues seeking a promotion or a resume boost, Subbiah said, because they are especially motivated to develop a high-quality application.
To help nominees, the committee finds letter writers who can pen the tailored, precise recommendations required for a winning nomination. Staff provide additional help with the applications. Jones said these contributions are a crucial leg up for overburdened faculty.
“It may seem like a no-brainer, but faculty have to be nominated in order to win awards,” he said. “Department heads don’t have the capacity to do awards nominations. Faculty and staff must deem it important and care enough to do it for each other.”
Celebrating success to spark motivation
To foster an appreciation for winning awards, the department publicly recognizes recipients. Monthly faculty meetings, as well as coffee-and-donut gatherings open to faculty, staff and students, begin with “good news” announcements, where recent honorees are announced.
The celebration extends beyond honorees to acknowledge the efforts of nominators and the awards committee. Though this behind-the-scenes work may not be glamorous, it’s a necessary step on the road to success.
“People who take the time to nominate need to be recognized,” Riley said. “It’s a point of pride for us to recognize the committee itself and thank these people for their efforts in putting people forward.”
The department also has a small-scale “wall of fame” that displays recent certificates and awards for faculty, staff and visitors.
The point of public recognition isn’t to elevate individual faculty or create an awards-obsessed environment, but to highlight the department’s collective success and offer a reminder that faculty and staff members’ work matters outside the university.
“We’re not focused on the awards themselves,” Jones said. “We’re using the awards as a means of promoting our department’s work.”
For more information about helping faculty pursue national honors, contact Liz Lange, national recognition and awards coordinator in the Office of Research and Economic Development, 402-472-3024.
WRITER: Tiffany Lee, research communications specialist, Office of Research and Economic Development