{"id":95,"date":"2017-10-24T20:46:47","date_gmt":"2017-10-24T20:46:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/research.unl.edu\/annualreport\/2017\/?p=95"},"modified":"2017-10-25T20:00:56","modified_gmt":"2017-10-25T20:00:56","slug":"understanding-girls-attitudes-toward-science","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/research.unl.edu\/annualreport\/2017\/understanding-girls-attitudes-toward-science\/","title":{"rendered":"Understanding Girls&#8217; Attitudes Toward Science"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Gender norms, stereotypes and friendships all play a role in curbing middle school girls\u2019 interest in science, a team of Nebraska sociologists found. A survey of 444 middle school students showed girls and boys had similar comprehension and grades in science. When asked about their friends, both genders were more likely to consider boys as a \u201cscience kind of person.\u201d Yet when asked to consider whether that label applied to themselves, both genders answered similarly, indicating that social perceptions about gender influence girls\u2019 career choices. The survey found that girls interested in science are more likely to have close friendships with like-minded girls. The study suggests educators can use inclusive science clubs, presentations from diverse scientists and lessons relating science to students\u2019 everyday interests to encourage girls\u2019 interest in science. The team, co-led by sociologists Patricia Wonch Hill and Robin Gauthier, published its findings in <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2076-0760\/6\/1\/14\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Social Sciences<\/a>.<\/em> The National Institutes of Health funded this research.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gender norms, stereotypes and friendships all play a role in curbing middle school girls\u2019 interest in science, a team of Nebraska sociologists found. A survey of 444 middle school students showed girls and boys had similar comprehension and grades in science. When asked about their friends, both genders were more likely to consider boys as [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":352,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[111],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-95","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-research-highlights"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/research.unl.edu\/annualreport\/2017\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/95","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/research.unl.edu\/annualreport\/2017\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/research.unl.edu\/annualreport\/2017\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/research.unl.edu\/annualreport\/2017\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/research.unl.edu\/annualreport\/2017\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=95"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/research.unl.edu\/annualreport\/2017\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/95\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":374,"href":"https:\/\/research.unl.edu\/annualreport\/2017\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/95\/revisions\/374"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/research.unl.edu\/annualreport\/2017\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/352"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/research.unl.edu\/annualreport\/2017\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=95"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/research.unl.edu\/annualreport\/2017\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=95"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/research.unl.edu\/annualreport\/2017\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=95"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}